-
Articles & Seminar Materials
- June 5 NYS Tax Litigation Seminar: Completion Certificate June 2, 2025
- June 5 NYS Tax Litigation Seminar — Outline May 31, 2025
- June 5 Tax Litigation Seminar — Supplementary Materials May 14, 2025
- June 5 CPE Seminar: NYS Tax Litigation — Practice & Procedure April 28, 2025
- March 13 CPE Seminar: Supplementary Materials March 4, 2025
- Income Taxation of New York Trusts & 2025 Planning Strategies March 4, 2025
- Webinar Recording of 1031 Final Regulations Seminar January 16, 2025
-
Natural Language Search
Search by Category
Most Popular
- Letters Testamentary
- Welcome
- Executor and Trustee Commissions Under NY EPTL
- Article 78 Appeals to Appellate Division, Third Department
- Distributable Net Income and Income in Respect of a Decedent
- 2007 Estate & Gift Tax Cases
- Creating and Maintaining Flexibility in Wills and Trusts
- Ninth Circuit Reverses Tax Court in Estate of Simplot
- Exclusion of Gain From Sale of Residence Under IRC Section 121
- Tax News & Comment -- May 2013
Tag Archives: replacement property
Like Kind Exchanges of Real Estate Under IRC Section 1031 — Treatise
Over the past three decades, Congress has enacted various Code provisions and modified existing provisions in an attempt to impede taxpayers’ ability to reduce income tax liability when engaging in real property transactions. The Section 1031 “like-kind” exchange is a powerful tax-deferral technique that has, for the most part, escaped rigorous Congressional scrutiny. The statute permits a taxpayer to relinquish property (often real property) held for “productive use in a trade or business” or for “investment” and exchange it for “like kind” replacement property, without recognizing gain or loss. A cash sale of property followed by a cash purchase of like kind property will not constitute a like kind exchange. Halpern v. U.S., 286 F.Supp. 255 (ND Ga. 1968); PLR 7918018. To constitute an “exchange” within the meaning of the statute, the transaction must be a “reciprocal transfer of property, as distinguished from a transfer of property for a money consideration only.” Regs. § 1.1002-1(d). The rationale for nonrecognition in this circumstance stems from Congress’ view that tax should not be imposed on realized gains where the investment continues in nearly identical form. Continue reading
You must be logged in to post a comment.