Search by Category
Natural Language Search
-
Recent Articles & Treatises
- Table of Contents for May 18 Lecture Materials April 28, 2023
- Register for Thursday, May 18 Tax Seminar in Old Westbury [click card to register] April 12, 2023
- Subscribe to Tax News & Comment April 6, 2023
- Tax News & Comment — April 2023 March 31, 2023
- Tax News & Comment — June 2019 March 4, 2023
- Tax News & Comment – April 2017 March 13, 2017
- Tax News & Comment — May 2016 May 14, 2016
- FROM WASHINGTON & ALBANY — Current Election Probabilities; Tax Plans of Trump and Clinton May 13, 2016
- FROM FEDERAL AND NYS COURTS: Recent Developments & 2015 Decisions of Note May 13, 2016
- IRS & NYS DTF MATTERS: Recent Developments & 2015 Regs. & Rulings of Note May 13, 2016
- Creating and Maintaining Flexibility in Wills and Trusts May 13, 2016
Most Popular
- Executor and Trustee Commissions Under NY EPTL
- Legal Basis for Seeking Abatement of New York State Tax Penalties
- Depreciation Recapture
- Article 78 Appeals to Appellate Division, Third Department
- Tax Planning and Tax Litigation
- Installment Sales in Real Estate Transactions
- Distributable Net Income and Income in Respect of a Decedent
- Conciliation Conference
- Defeating The Right of Election in EPTL § 5-1.1-A
- Gain, Loss and Depreciation Issues in Like Kind Exchange
Tag Archives: mortgage boot
Like Kind Exchanges of Real Estate Under IRC Section 1031 — Treatise
Over the past three decades, Congress has enacted various Code provisions and modified existing provisions in an attempt to impede taxpayers’ ability to reduce income tax liability when engaging in real property transactions. The Section 1031 “like-kind” exchange is a powerful tax-deferral technique that has, for the most part, escaped rigorous Congressional scrutiny. The statute permits a taxpayer to relinquish property (often real property) held for “productive use in a trade or business” or for “investment” and exchange it for “like kind” replacement property, without recognizing gain or loss. A cash sale of property followed by a cash purchase of like kind property will not constitute a like kind exchange. Halpern v. U.S., 286 F.Supp. 255 (ND Ga. 1968); PLR 7918018. To constitute an “exchange” within the meaning of the statute, the transaction must be a “reciprocal transfer of property, as distinguished from a transfer of property for a money consideration only.” Regs. § 1.1002-1(d). The rationale for nonrecognition in this circumstance stems from Congress’ view that tax should not be imposed on realized gains where the investment continues in nearly identical form. Continue reading