Seven Tax-Planning Strategies to Dodge the Tax Bullet – Forbes.
-
Articles & Seminar Materials
- June 5 NYS Tax Litigation Seminar: Completion Certificate June 2, 2025
- June 5 NYS Tax Litigation Seminar — Outline May 31, 2025
- June 5 Tax Litigation Seminar — Supplementary Materials May 14, 2025
- June 5 CPE Seminar: NYS Tax Litigation — Practice & Procedure April 28, 2025
- March 13 CPE Seminar: Supplementary Materials March 4, 2025
- Income Taxation of New York Trusts & 2025 Planning Strategies March 4, 2025
- Webinar Recording of 1031 Final Regulations Seminar January 16, 2025
-
Natural Language Search
Search by Category
Most Popular
- Welcome
- Executor and Trustee Commissions Under NY EPTL
- Distributable Net Income and Income in Respect of a Decedent
- Defeating The Right of Election in EPTL § 5-1.1-A
- Challenging The Account of a Fiduciary
- Use of Disclaimers in Pre and Post-Mortem Estate Planning
- Avoiding Boot Gain in Like Kind Exchanges
- Defining the Scope of Trustee Powers
- AVOIDING CHALLENGES TO TESTAMENTARY INSTRUMENTS
- Current Estate Planning Trends (January 2000)
2012 Gift & Estate Tax Decisions of Note
View in PDF: Tax News & Comment — February 2013
2012 Gift & Estate Tax Decisions of Note
I. Formula Clauses
The Tax Court in Wandry v. Com’r, T.C. Memo 2012-88, nonacq., 2012-46 I.R.B. upheld a defined value clause containing a formula transfer clause. The case is significant since it seemingly vanquished the last vestiges of Proctor v. Com’r, 142 F.2d 824 (4th Cir. 1944) which had invalidated savings clauses as violating public policy, and marks the first time that a court affirmatively sanctioned the use of formula clauses in cases not involving a charitable overflow beneficiary. Some believe that reliance on Wandry may be risky until other Circuits opine. [See Tax Court Defies IRS: Expands Use of Defined Value Clauses, Tax News & Comment, October 2012.] Continue reading →
Share this: