-
Articles & Seminar Materials
- June 5 NYS Tax Litigation Seminar: Completion Certificate June 2, 2025
- June 5 NYS Tax Litigation Seminar — Outline May 31, 2025
- June 5 Tax Litigation Seminar — Supplementary Materials May 14, 2025
- June 5 CPE Seminar: NYS Tax Litigation — Practice & Procedure April 28, 2025
- March 13 CPE Seminar: Supplementary Materials March 4, 2025
- Income Taxation of New York Trusts & 2025 Planning Strategies March 4, 2025
- Webinar Recording of 1031 Final Regulations Seminar January 16, 2025
-
Natural Language Search
Search by Category
Most Popular
- Letters Testamentary
- Executor and Trustee Commissions Under NY EPTL
- Tax Aspects of Incorporating
- Defeating The Right of Election in EPTL § 5-1.1-A
- Modifying or "Decanting" Irrevocable Trusts: New York's Decanting Statute Annotated
- Defeating The Right of Election in EPTL § 5-1.1-A
- Installment Sales in Real Estate Transactions
- Valuation Discounts for LLCs
- Validity, Interpretation & Effect of Wills Having Jurisdiction Outside of New York
- Perspective on 2001 Tax Act
Tag Archives: matter of gaied
FROM WASHINGTON & ALBANY — Current Election Probabilities; Tax Plans of Trump and Clinton
As of April 22, the probability of Hillary Clinton becoming the Democratic nominee is .939 (1/15 odds); that of her becoming President, .727 (2/5 odds). Mr. Trump now has a .664 probability (1/2 odds) of prevailing in Cleveland, but only … Continue reading
Posted in From Washington, News
Tagged 1041(d), Badgett v. commissioner, baeubrun v. commissioner, Billhartz v. commissioner, crummey powers;, estate of, estate of pulling v. commissioner, estate of redstone v. comm'r, estate of sanfilippo v. commissioner, exxon mobil v. state new york, federal tax refunds, hughes v. commissioner, irc 6901, matter of gaied, matter of ryan new york, matter of zanetti, new york state residency audit, people v. nextel court of appeals, permanent place of above new york, reasonable cause federal tax penalties, SEC v. Wyly, specht v. united states, tax payments or tax deposits, trust protectors;, united states v. stiles, west v. koshkinen, windford v. commissioner
Leave a comment